motivation finished

This commit is contained in:
Armin Friedl 2016-06-27 00:30:37 +02:00
parent 0ecae6fc7a
commit cd4a8e81cd
10 changed files with 238 additions and 26 deletions

2
.gitignore vendored
View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
talk.pdf
upperbounds.pdf
# Created by https://www.gitignore.io/api/latex,tex,emacs,linux

20
inputs/elimination.tex Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
\begin{frame}{Table of contents}
\setbeamertemplate{section in toc}[sections numbered]
\setbeamertemplate{subsection in toc}[square]
\tableofcontents[sections={2}]
\end{frame}
\subsection{Idea}
\begin{frame}{}
\end{frame}
\subsection{Test1}
\subsection{Test2}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: "../upperbounds"
%%% End:

14
inputs/introduction.tex Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
\begin{frame}{Table of contents}
\setbeamertemplate{section in toc}[sections numbered]
\tableofcontents[hideallsubsections]
\end{frame}
\section{Introduction}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: "../upperbounds"
%%% End:

106
inputs/motivation.tex Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
\begin{frame}{General Motivation}
\begin{columns}[c]
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Choose infeasible problem
\begin{itemize}
\item Combinatorial Problems
\item Computational Biology
\item Constraint Satisfaction
\item \dots{}
\end{itemize}
\item Find FPT$_{tw}$ algorithm
\item Model problem as graph
\item Compute \emph{tree composition} with small \emph{tree width}
\uncover<2>{\alert{\item Tract the intractable}}
\end{enumerate}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{0.8\textwidth}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[xscale=1.5,yscale=1.6]
\tikzstyle{every node}=[]
\tikzstyle{every path}=[line width=0pt]
%
\begin{scope}
\draw[fill,green,opacity=1,line width=0]
(-1.5,0) -- (1.5,0)
(-1,0) .. controls (-.8,1) and (.8,1) .. (1,0);
;
%
\draw[fill,green!50,opacity=1,line width=0]
(-1,0) .. controls (-.8,1) and (.8,1) .. (1,0)
(1.1,0) .. controls (1.1,2.5) and (-1.1,2.5) .. (-1.1,0)
;
%
\draw[fill,red!50,opacity=1,line width=0]
(1.1,0) .. controls (1.1,2.5) and (-1.1,2.5) .. (-1.1,0)
(-1.2,0) .. controls (-1.2,3.5) and (1.2,3.5) .. (1.2,0)
;
%
\draw[fill,red!100,opacity=1,line width=0]
(-1.2,0) .. controls (-1.2,3.5) and (1.2,3.5) .. (1.2,0)
(1.5,0) .. controls (1.5,4.5) and (-3,4.5) .. (-1.5,0)
;
\draw[fill,red!100,opacity=1,line width=0]
(-1.2,0) .. controls (-1.2,3.5) and (1.2,3.5) .. (1.2,0)
(1.5,0) .. controls (3,4.5) and (-1.5,4.5) .. (-1.5,0)
;
%
\draw
(-1.5,0) -- (1.5,0)
(0,0.25) node[] {P}
(-1,0) .. controls (-.8,1) and (.8,1) .. (1,0)
%
(0,1.25) node[] {FPT}
(-1.1,0) .. controls (-1.1,2.5) and (1.1,2.5) .. (1.1,0)
%
(0,2.15) node[] {W[i]}
(-1.2,0) .. controls (-1.2,3.5) and (1.2,3.5) .. (1.2,0)
%
(-1,2.9) node[] {XP}
% (0,2.8) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
% (0,2.6) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
% (0,2.4) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
(-1.5,0) .. controls (-3,4.5) and (1.5,4.5) .. (1.5,0)
%
(1,2.9) node[] {paraNP}
% (0,2.8) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
% (0,2.6) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
% (0,2.4) node[circle,black,fill,inner sep=0pt] {}
(-1.5,0) .. controls (-1.5,4.5) and (3,4.5) .. (1.5,0)
;
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Why Upper Bounds?}
\metroset{block=fill}
\begin{block}{We want (efficiently)}
\begin{itemize}
\item \emph{High} Lower Bound: Tree dec. not the right tool
\item \emph{Low} Upper Bound: Tree dec. works
\item Other combinations? -- Not so useful
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\begin{block}{What this paper is about}
\smallskip
Exact algorithm: Huge constant factor \cite{roehrig1998}
\begin{itemize}
\item[$\rightarrow$] Find a non-optimal tree decomposition
\item[$\rightarrow$] This is also an Upper Bound
\end{itemize}
\end{block}
\end{frame}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: "../upperbounds"
%%% End:

BIN
res/down.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.3 KiB

BIN
res/up.png Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.4 KiB

View file

@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
%\usepackage{lmodern}
%\usepackage{helvet}
\usetheme{metropolis}
\subject{Upper Bounds}
\title[Upper Bounds]{Upper Bounds for Treewidth}
\subtitle{}
\author{Armin Friedl}
\date{\today}
\begin{document}
\frame{\titlepage}
\end{document}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:

32
upperbounds.bib Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
% This file was created with JabRef 2.10.
% Encoding: ISO8859_1
@Article{bodlaender2010,
Title = {Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds},
Author = {Hans L. Bodlaender and Arie M.C.A. Koster},
Year = {2010},
Doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2009.03.008},
ISSN = {0890-5401},
Number = {3},
Pages = {259 - 275},
Url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540109000947},
Volume = {208},
Abstract = {For more and more applications, it is important to be able to compute the treewidth of a given graph and to find tree decompositions of small width reasonably fast. This paper gives an overview of several upper bound heuristics that have been proposed and tested for the problem of determining the treewidth of a graph and finding tree decompositions. Each of the heuristics produces tree decompositions whose width may be larger than the optimal width. However, experiments show that in many cases, the heuristics give tree decompositions whose width is close to the exact treewidth of the input graphs.},
Journal = {Information and Computation},
Keywords = {Treewidth}
}
@Mastersthesis{roehrig1998,
Title = {{{Tree Decomposition: A Feasibility Study}}},
Author = {Hein R{\"o}hrig},
Institution = {Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik},
Year = {1998},
Location = {Saarbrücken, Germany},
Url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.132.7594&rep=rep1&type=pdf},
Owner = {armin},
Timestamp = {2016.06.26}
}

BIN
upperbounds.pdf Normal file

Binary file not shown.

65
upperbounds.tex Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
\documentclass[10pt]{beamer}
\usepackage{appendixnumberbeamer}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage[scale=2]{ccicons}
\usepackage{pgfplots}
\usepgfplotslibrary{dateplot}
\usepackage{xspace}
%\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{scalerel}
% == General Beamer Settings ==
\usetheme{metropolis}
% == Presentation Settings ==
\def\thumbsup{\scalerel*{\includegraphics{res/up.png}}{O}}
\def\thumbsdown{\scalerel*{\includegraphics{res/down.png}}{O}}
\subject{Upper Bounds}
\title[Upper Bounds]{Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds}
\subtitle{Hans L. Bodlaender, Arie M.C.A Koster}
\author{Armin Friedl}
\date{\today}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{frame}{Table of contents}
\setbeamertemplate{section in toc}[sections numbered]
\tableofcontents[hideallsubsections]
\end{frame}
\section{Motivation}
\input{inputs/motivation}
\section{Elimination Ordering Methods}
\input{inputs/elimination}
\begin{frame}{Table of contents}
\setbeamertemplate{section in toc}[sections numbered]
\setbeamertemplate{subsection in toc}[square]
\tableofcontents[sections={2}]
\end{frame}
\subsection{Idea}
\subsection{Test1}
\subsection{Test2}
\section{Separator Methods}
\section{Results}
\begin{frame}[allowframebreaks]{References}
\nocite{bodlaender2010}
\bibliography{upperbounds}
\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End: